5 - Fossile brensler
✏️ This explanation does not yet exist in your language. Please fill this Google Form if you want to help us!
Det oppstår ofte diskusjoner om å sette fossile energikilder før eller etter menneskelige aktiviteter. Det er som høna og egget: det finnes ikke noe riktig svar. Det er et spørsmål om dialektikk. Man bør ikke kaste bort tid på det. Grafen viser de globale CO2-utslippene fra fossile energikilder alene. Den svarte kurven viser tidligere utslipp, og i farger, projeksjonene i henhold til de 5 scenariene studert av IPCC i den 6. rapporten (AR6). For de 2 blå scenariene (SSP1-1.9 og SSP1-2.6), må de forventede utslippene bli null, henholdsvis i 2060 og 2080. Fossile energikilder er: kull, olje og naturgass[1].
AR6 WG1 Figur SPM.4 s30 (s13) ↩︎
3Causes
2Consequences
It's written on card 7!
2Other possible causes
Conflicts are often linked to fossil fuels, but the link is more the other way round.
Agriculture does not use much fossil fuel, just enough to keep tractors running. Its carbon emissions are high, bu mainly because of methane and nitrous oxide.
6Other possible consequences
What comes first? Do human activities cause the use of fossil fuels or do fossil fuels ensable human activities? Don't waste time on this and group the two cards together if necessary. Plenty of activities, happily, do not require burning fossil fuels, like windmills and watermills grinding grains for flour.
see 5=>1
Oils slicks in the ocean are an example of a link between fossil fuels and marine biodiversity.
see 5=>1
see 5=>1
Although conflicts may occur because of resources, they are not directly caused by climate change, rather by resource depletion or scarcity. The relationship can be made, but it is due more to politics than to the climate crisis.